Reablement Services

1.Does the Council offer an in-house Reablement services for adult social care

Yes

2. How many service users in the following financial years (April to March) went through the reablement from service?

2021-22

2022-23

2023- date

Please see the table below:

3.What is the average time a service user spends in the reablement service?

 

Please see the table below:

4.Is the service for all adults 18+

Yes

5.What is the annual spend on reablement in the following financial years

2022-3 – Spend £5,132,900, Income -£599,951, Total £4,532,949

2023-4 – Actual figures at the end of M11 Spend £4,584,092, Income -£922,770, Total £3,661,322

Forecasted figures for 23.24 Spend £5,155,282, Income -£922,770, Total £4,232,512

6.What is the forecast or budget for 2024-5?

Spend £5,507,000, Income £896,000, Total £4,611,000

7.How many service users per year have gone through the reablement service in

2021-22

2022-3

2023-4

Please see our response to question 2

8. What is the average time a service user spends in the reablement service?

Please see our response to question 3

9. How many FTE staff work on the reablement service? Can you break down their grade and salary banding. Eg 10 workers at grade 3 £15-17k

• * 126.8 FTE (170 headcount) working in Social Care Reablement.

Please see the table below:

10. What KPIs (Key performance Indicators) are used for the service/ the service is measured against?

We can confirm that we make use of National Indicators

The ASCOF handbook of definitions for 2023-24 can be accessed here Adult social care outcomes framework: handbook of definitions – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

By way of further explanation:

2B1 and 2B2 are specifically indicators relatiig to older people.

 2B1 – proportion of older people discharged from hospital into rehabilitation/reablement services still at home 91 days post-discharge

2B2 – proportion of older people discharged from hospital offered rehabilitation/reablement services

Denominator of part 1 becomes the numerator of part 2.

Definition is very specific measuring discharges 1 October to 31 December with outcomes tracked 1 January to 31 March

2D – outcome of short term services: sequel to service

Looks at the number of new clients where the sequel to ST-MAX was:

• On-going low level support
• STS (other)
• No service provided – universal services/signposted to other services
• No services provided – no identified needs

Source: SALT STS002a table 1

Local Short Term Service Performance Indicators includes a combination of reablement and other short term services

L90 – measures the reach of short term services to maximise independence per 100K population

L92 –  New clients – no new ongoing service 90 days after end of short term service to maximise independence.

L93 – Existing clients – all services ended following end of short term service to maximise independence.

L94 – Existing clients – reduction in service following end of short term service to maximise independence.

L95 – looks at the proportion of existing clients where services stayed the same following the end of short terms services to maximise independence.

11. What is the performance against these KPIs in the current financial year?

Locally we calculate the performance each month and latest available data to end of January 2024

2B1 = 65.8%

2B2 = 2.4%

2D = 95.4%

L90 = 349.43

L92 = 56.51%

L93 =18.95%

L94 = 6.32%

L95 = 26.4