1.How many working-age adults (aged 18-64) with a learning disability were refused an assessment for adult social care in:
a. 2018/19
b. 2017/18
c. 2016/17
d. 2015/16
e. 2014/15
Financial Year | No of unique clients |
2014- 2015 | 143 |
2015 – 2016 | 167 |
2016 – 2017 | 206 |
2017 – 2018 | 192 |
2018 – 2019 | 105 |
Total | 813 (672 unique across whole date range) |
We do not hold information on individuals who do get assessed. We do record data about individuals who are assessed as not requiring statutory services provided by the local authority – see below – and on individuals who had an assessment halted for a variety of reasons, although the reasons themselves are not recorded.
Data has been filtered to identify those clients who are aged 18-64 years old where the primary support reason is learning disability, where their assessment was ended within the financial year and the outcome was Abandoned, or No Eligible Needs.
2. In 2018/19, from the date of their first request for an initial assessment for adult social care, or from the date when the LA first became aware that an assessment was required, how many working-age adults (aged 18-64) with a learning disability had to wait:
a. Over 6 weeks for an assessment to be completed
b. Over 12 weeks for an assessment to be completed
c. Over 24 weeks for an assessment to be completed
d. Please also provide answers to 2(a) to 2(c) for the following years:
i. 2017/18
ii. 2016/17
iii. 2015/16
iv. 2014/15
Financial Year | Waiting time = 6 weeks | 6 – 11 weeks | 12 – 23 weeks | >24 weeks | Total | of which unique in Financial Year |
2014 – 2015 | 1,360 | 190 | 90 | 41 | 1,681 | 1552 |
2015 – 2016 | 978 | 244 | 141 | 43 | 1,406 | 1237 |
2016 – 2017 | 818 | 315 | 331 | 203 | 1,667 | 1390 |
2017 – 2018 | 897 | 356 | 306 | 243 | 1,802 | 1574 |
2018 – 2019 | 679 | 242 | 155 | 109 | 1,185 | 1061 |
Totals | 4,732 | 1,347 | 1,023 | 639 | 7,741 | |
of which unique across whole date range | 2476 | 1061 | 851 | 551 | 2913 |
This has been filtered for those clients who are aged 18-64 years old with an LD primary support reason. We have then calculated the difference between the start and end of the assessment.
3. In 2018/19, from the date of their first request for an initial assessment for adult social care, or from the date when the LA first became aware that an assessment was required, how many working-age adults (aged 18-64) had to wait:
a. Over 6 weeks for an assessment to be completed
b. Over 12 weeks for an assessment to be completed
c. Over 24 weeks for an assessment to be completed
d. Please also provide answers to 3(a) to 3(c) for the following years:
i. 2017/18
ii. 2016/17
iii. 2015/16
iv. 2014/15
Financial Year | <6 weeks | 6 – 11 weeks | 12 – 23 weeks | >24 weeks | Total | of which unique in financial year |
2014 – 2015 | 2,720 | 763 | 381 | 120 | 3,984 | 3497 |
2015 – 2016 | 2,472 | 904 | 529 | 151 | 4,056 | 3432 |
2016- 2017 | 2,323 | 881 | 483 | 277 | 3,694 | 3425 |
2017 – 2018 | 2,237 | 677 | 347 | 230 | 3,491 | 3121 |
2018 – 2019 | 1,204 | 297 | 169 | 103 | 1,773 | 1618 |
Total | 1o,956 | 3,522 | 1,909 | 881 | 17,268 | |
Of which unique across whole date range | 6986 | 2882 | 1600 | 769 | 8924 |
This has been filtered for those clients who are aged 18-64 years old without an LD primary support reason. We have then calculated the difference between the start and end of the assessment
4. How many working-age adults (aged 18-64) with a learning disability had an assessment for adult social care which identified eligible needs in the following years?
a. 2018/19
b. 2017/18
c. 2016/17
d. 2015/16
e. 2014/15
Financial Year | Number of unique clients | |
2014 – 2015 | 1,464 | |
2015 – 2016 | 1,129 | |
2016 – 2017 | 1,259 | |
2017 – 2018 | 1,453 | |
2018 – 2019 | 999 | |
Total | 6,304 | Of which unique across whole cohort |
This has been filtered for those clients who are aged 18-64 with an LD primary support reason. We have then picked up Eligible Needs based on the outcome of the assessment. The drop in numbers could be because of the introduction of a new process which means that some client needs are signposted elsewhere to support their needs.
5. Of the adults identified in questions 4(a) to 4(e) how many were not having all of their eligible needs met after:
a. 6 weeks
b. 12 weeks
c. 24 weeks
Financial Year | < six weeks | 6-11 weeks | 12 – 23 weeks | >24 weeks | Total | of which unique in financial year |
2014 – 2015 | 1,284 | 425 | 348 | 169 | 2,226 | 1464 |
2015 – 2016 | 909 | 409 | 355 | 156 | 1,829 | 1129 |
2016 – 2017 | 752 | 404 | 446 | 357 | 1,959 | 1259 |
2017 – 2018 | 807 | 451 | 473 | 385 | 2,116 | 1453 |
2018 – 2019 | 487 | 285 | 231 | 165 | 1,168 | 999 |
Total | 4,239 | 1,974 | 1,853 | 1,232 | 9,298 | |
Of which unique across whole date range | 2287 | 1431 | 1376 | 1005 | 2707 |
This has been filtered for those clients who are aged 18-64 with an LD primary support reason. The question has missed the majority of these clients who are assessed and have their care services in place in under 6 weeks. This represents the majority of our service users (84.5% are assessed and have services set up under six weeks). This data is showing the difference between the start date of the assessment form and the end date of the care plan (where it exists).
6. In 2018/19, how many working-age adults (aged 18-64) with a learning disability had an assessment for adult social care which resulted in no services being provided?
Financial Year | Number of unique clients |
2014 – 2015 | 115 |
2015 – 2016 | 112 |
2016 – 2017 | 109 |
2017 – 2018 | 142 |
2018 – 2019 | 105 |
Total | 583 ( of which 483 unique across whole cohort) |
This has been filtered for those clients who are aged 18-64 years old with an LD primary support reason. Where their assessment was ended within the financial year and the outcome was No Eligible Needs (excl. Abandon to make this different from Q1).
If data is not available for 2018/19, please supply the information for the most recent year that data is available for. Please exclude those who received no services for the reason ‘deceased’.