Skip to content

Farming family plead guilty to animal welfare offences


We are encouraging farmers who are struggling to seek help if things are getting too much for them.

It follows the prosecution of family of livestock and dairy farmers who have been banned from keeping cattle, sheep and pigs for 10 years for causing suffering to animals in their care.

Edward Dunn, 79, Rosemund Dunn, 76, and their son William Dunn, 50, of Underdown Farm, Exbourne, pleaded guilty to dozens of animal welfare offences at Exeter Magistrates Court last Thursday (June 26).

The offences took place across Underdown Farm and East Barton Farm – the farms are adjacent and have approximately 170 cattle.

They are jointly owned by Edward and Rosemund Dunn while William is responsible for the day-to-day running of both.

William Dunn pleaded guilty to 24 offences, including six of causing an animal to suffer unnecessarily across their two farms, while Edward and Rosamund Dunn pleaded guilty to 10 charges each of failing to ensure the welfare of animals.

The court heard that trading standards and the Animal and Plant Health Agency inspected the farms several times between 2023 and 2025 and found lame cows untreated, vulnerable calves surrounded by broken bicycles, piles of rubbish, gas canisters and broken bottles and livestock with no shelter, food or water.

On one occasion they found a cow lying down in a field; she was soaking wet, shivering from pain and cold and unable to stand.

Cattle were found standing in knee deep slurry with no feed other than wrapped bales and they had to eat through plastic to feed.  

One young heifer was found injured from being picked up in a tractor bucket. No vet had been called and no treatment given.

A baby calf was found in a small hutch; it was unresponsive with laboured breathing. It had not received any treatment, and it died.

During each visit officers found dead cattle in cubicles or partially buried in areas where livestock had access, which increased the risk of disease.

Each time the Dunn’s were given clear advice, detailing what was wrong and what they needed to do. And on each occasion the advice was ignored.

During sentencing District Judge Smith said the images and videos were ‘shocking’ ‘and ‘distressing to see’ and that there was ‘compelling evidence’ that many animals had been suffering for a ‘significant period of time’

Judge Smith said that the Dunn’s had repeatedly ignored warnings and there were ‘repeated failures to ensure the welfare of cattle’ and added: “No doubt farming is very demanding, but you should have maintained standards of hygiene and the wellbeing of the herd.

“I don’t consider your intent was to cause harm or problems with parlour. Overwhelmed. Beyond your capacity. You allowed things to happen and didn’t act on advice.

“Devon has a proud heritage of dairy farming and your neglect and disregard of welfare could cause damage to the reputation of our dairy industry.”

In mitigation Counsel Phillipa Harper said that it was ‘not intentional cruelty’ but the result of a myriad of problems that had built up since the pandemic.

She said that increasing debt, struggles to employ workers and the deterioration of Edward Dunn’s health were all contributary factors.

“William Dunn was left doing too much on his own. He was overwhelmed and disorganised and is extremely remorseful,” she added.

Councillor Simon Clist, Devon County Council’s cabinet member for trading Standards, and a farmer, said:

“While taking action like this is often the last resort, trading standards will take appropriate action to ensure that animals are kept in a safe and healthy environment.

“Farming is a large part of our economy, and the continuing welfare of animals is a priority for the service and of concern to the wider public.

“I understand how difficult farming can be but please, if you are a farmer and you are struggling, seek help; there is support available. Because if you don’t you could be putting your livelihood at risk.”

Alex Fry, Operations Manager for Heart of the South West trading Standards, said:

A“The conditions in which these animals were kept fell well below acceptable welfare standards.  The Dunn’s failure to follow our advice left us with no alternative but to take formal action against them in the courts.

“We have a duty to ensure that animal welfare standards are complied with.”

Additional to the ban each defendent was ordered to pay more than £3,000 in costs.

You can find information on getting support on the trading standards website.