SPORTS & LEISURE

However, lack of numbers need not prevent these activities: neither does a lack of facilities necessarily preclude a team forming for a sports activity. For example, although there is no golf course, and unlikely to be one in Hennock or Teign Village, there could be an opportunity for the 25 people interested to form their own ‘club’ to visit other courses and play. Similarly, if badminton is not possible in the village, it is certainly available within a short drive, and a village club or league could perhaps play at another sports hall.
Most would use a Youth Club only ‘sometimes’, but 35 people would help in transporting young people to other villages or towns.
The Playgroup appears to have a reasonable future, with 13 participating and 4 prepared to organise. Actually, this is already up and running, and the group are very keen to expand and have recently been awarded a lottery grant for equipment and toys. They still need a qualified leader though.
Of the 162 people who had an opinion on the Children’s Playground, 59% considered the facilities poor. (Plans have already been agreed for a new car park and improved playground in the centre of Hennock Village)
28 people have offered to help with the ‘What’s on in Hennock & Teign Village’ news sheet.
125 people (46%) feel that visitors need more information about the parish.
Only 76 people would use a weekly Mobile Library on a regular basis, so the present fortnightly arrangement seems adequate.
…should be available to people working in the day…
Recommendations:
TRAFFIC, TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS
The 127 households who responded have 223 cars and 30 motorbikes. Most cars are parked off the road or in a garage (152). Only 17 park in a public car park leaving 68 parked on the road. Not surprisingly, 138 drivers (57%) experience parking problems, while 103 never do. The figures show no clear bias for any particular area, although comments suggest that parking for the school run may cause difficulty. There certainly appears to be a need for more parking places.
Four households in Teign Village and one in Hennock have no car, and these may face transport difficulties that could be alleviated by adopting the ‘good Neighbour’ scheme mentioned earlier.
Most people feel that there is a need for road signs in the village: only 18% feel that none are needed. 70% would like a speed limit introduced: for Teign Village alone that rose to 94%. ’Please Drive Slowly’ signs are favoured by 66% and speed limit signs by 51%. ‘Children at Play’ signs are also favoured by 51%, so there is definite concern over speed in all parts of the community.

On the whole, those in Hennock & Teign Village are more satisfied with the state of the roads, whilst those in outlying areas are not. Nearly all are satisfied with the directional road signs. Street lighting is generally considered adequate.

However a clear majority feel that there are danger spots within the village.
Those named most often were: outside the school (mentioned 10 times); between Meadowbrook and Shute Cottage (9), Bell Lane & outside the Palk Arms (7) and outside Teign Village playpark (6). Butt Park and Road Park between them scored seven hits. Five Lanes, the narrows by Hele Farm/West Hele, the top end of Stickwick Hill, and the road below Leigh Farm were each mentioned five times.
HGVs are felt to be a problem by 62%, mainly in Hennock (70%).
Danger spots are everywhere because of the speed & a lot of vehicles
There is always a danger on roads
Recommendations:
BUS SERVICES
Most would like the existing service to be improved. Of the 142 respondents, 83% would like improvements to the routes, and further improvements were needed to the timetable, reliability and cost. Preferred destinations would be to Bovey Tracey, with Newton Abbot a close second, and then to Exeter, Chudleigh, and Kingsteignton. There was one request for a service between Teign Village and Hennock. Friday and Saturday were the preferred days for travel, but more than a quarter would like a service every day.
It is clear that the existing service is regarded by those that use it as totally inadequate for the present needs of our community, who were not consulted before it was introduced. A petition has been passed to the District Council asking that the matter be given urgent attention, taking into account the requests for improvement.
Recommendation:
FUNDING SUGGESTIONS
There is strong support for improvements to the community to be funded from within. Fundraising, sponsorship and to a smaller extent, private contributions all found favour, with very little enthusiasm for any increases to Council Tax. However, there is a limit to the amount of money that a small community like ours can draw on so it may be prudent to seek to fund the larger projects (i.e. those which will benefit everyone) through the local authorities and whatever grants may be available. This reserves community cash for smaller initiatives in which only a section of the community may wish to take part.
Lottery funding
EEC
Recommendations:
CONCLUSION
Some didn’t wish to be involved, or had no opinion on matters of change, so presumably these people are happy, and wish to leave well alone. Of the remainder, most would prefer that housing remain more or less the same except maybe a small increase in housing for local people.
There is a lot of demand for both villages to be cleaner and visually more attractive; some areas are mentioned repeatedly.
Volume of traffic and therefore road safety is of major concern and requests are for speed restrictions through both villages and the surrounding lanes. A reduction in HGVs would also be welcomed. A sensibly routed and better timed bus service would make life easier for many, and may help reduce daytime traffic.
So, small seems to be the ideal - "We wish to remain villages and not become towns".
A total of 23 recommendations have been made through this appraisal, and it is important that we do not lose sight of them. Therefore the Appraisal Steering Group make a final recommendation that
Recommendation: