Cover Page

Index, Introduction

Overview of Respondents, Housing, Community Facilities, Sport Social & Entertainment

Transport & Highways, Info. & Communications

Local Countryside & Environment

Employment & Local Economy, Tourism, Shopping

Health & Social Services, Local Government, Comments & Quotes

Action Plan

[DF&F Main Menu] [Community Profiles Menu] [Community Appraisals Menu]

Index

Overview of Respondents

295 households responded. A description of those households and their members is below.

Table to show Gender and Age of the People Living In the Responding Households.

 

 

Age (in years)

 

0-4

5-10

11-16

17-21

22-39

40-59

60-64

65-74

75+

Total

Male

11

17

17

8

49

87

17

44

54

304

Female

18

18

18

17

51

88

22

63

54

349

Total

29

35

35

25

100

175

39

107

108

653

We can, therefore, see that there were slightly more female respondents than male and that the age of respondents is fairly top heavy with far more older respondents than younger.

Chart to show Number of People Living in Each Household

Household Breakdown Pie Chart

570 people from these households completed the individual elements of the questionnaire.


Index Top

Housing

Regarding the number of houses built over the last 10 years within the Parish, 187 respondents (33%) thought the number about right, 316 respondents (56%) thought there had been too much new housing, 9 people (2%) thought not enough new housing had been built and 51 people (9%) had no opinion.

549 people gave a response to the question on housing needs. Around 56% want some housing development, 205 people (37%) thought no more housing was required and 38 people (7%) had no opinion. The table below shows responses to the need for various types of housing.

Housing Graphic

 

No. Respondents

% Respondents

Housing for local people

204

37%

Housing for young people

116

21%

Housing for low income families

70

13%

Sheltered housing

66

12%

Housing for the elderly

57

10%

Large family housing

20

4%

417 respondents (77%) believe that development in Hemyock should be reduced with provision being made in other settlement areas.

When asked about the development of housing stock in Hemyock over the forthcoming 10 years, 357 people (64%) said they would like to see the stock remain the same. However, it is worth bearing in mind any benefits that could result through further housing development i.e. play area/car park etc. The Table on next page shows the responses of those who would like to see some increase in housing stock.

Table to show Respondents Views on Future Increases in Housing Stock

 

No. Respondents

% Respondents

Remain same

357

64%

Increase by less than 10

55

10%

Increase by less than 20

56

10%

Increase by less than 30

32

6%

Increase by less than 40

11

2%

Increase by less than 50

17

3%

Increase by more than 50

8

1%

Editor’s Comment

"Oh dear, this would surely make the average age of village inhabitants even older, because house prices would inevitably rise, stopping young people from buying houses locally."

Index Top

Community Facilities

Respondents were asked if the Parish Council should seek suitable premises in Hemyock for com-munity use. 274 respondents (50%) said "yes", 197 people (36%) said "no", 75 (14%) had no opinion.

Respondents were also asked what use they would support in such a building. 243 people answered this question, with many supporting more than one option. Results can be seen in the table below.

Editor’s Comment

Over the past 10 years especially the Parish Council has desperately needed a building

of its own. (To provide an area for our 3 computers, the tithe map, parish meetings, civic functions, etc.)

It would be of great interest to be H.G. Well's hero and journey forward 50 years to see what the village thinks then of no need for community premises. The Parish Council has some foresight.

Table to show Support for Community Building Uses

 

No. Respondents

% Respondents

A.0.N.B. Centre

119

49%

Community Office Facilities

111

46%

Advice Centre/One Stop Shop

96

40%

Computer/IT Training

82

34%

Parish Council Offices

70

29%

Business Association Offices

43

18%

History Archive

11

5%

Other

54

22%

The Appraisal then asked if the Playgroup would benefit from moving from the Parish Hall to new premises nearer the school. The same question was asked about the Mothers and Toddlers Group. The Charts below show responses.

Charts showing response to whether Childcare Facilities should move

Playgroup Pie ChartMother & Toddler Group Pie Chart

We can see that there is not support for moving the Mother & Toddler group and opinion is split over moving the playgroup. Further investigation needs to be undertaken with users of the two groups.

A knock-on effect of groups moving from the Parish Hall would mean increased availability of the Hall during the day time. The table below shows the responses of how the Hall could be used.

Table to show Support for Suggested Parish Hall Daytime Uses

 

No. Respondents

% Respondents

Adult Education Classes

212

55%

WI Market

193

50%

Surgeries

182

47%

Dining/Social Club > 50s

122

32%

Short Mat Bowls

81

32%

Indoor Croquet

38

10%

Other

26

7%


Index Top

Sport, Social & Entertainment

Current Facilities

Respondents were asked for their opinion of current social/recreational facilities for various age groups within the parish. The table below shows responses to this question and shows facilities for those under 26 years to be poor, with facilities for those between 26 and 60 being seen as reasonable and views on those for over 60s split between reasonable and good. This shows a need for additional facilities, especially those for children and young people.

Table to show Respondents Views on Social/Recreational Facilities

 

Good

Reasonable

Poor

No opinion

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Under 17’s

54

12%

116

27%

176

40%

91

21%

17-25’s

17

4%

81

19%

230

53%

109

25%

26-60’s

76

18%

195

45%

81

19%

79

18%

Over 60’s

190

41%

165

36%

20

4%

87

19%

Overall

337

19%

557

32%

507

29%

366

21%

Future Improvements to Recreational Facilities

Respondents were then asked if they felt that funding should be found to improve social/recreational facilities for young people. 74% of all respondents felt that money should be sought for this purpose, and 97% of those respondents who were themselves aged 11-16 supported this.

Charts to show Support for Accessing Funding to Improve Facilities for Young People

Funding - All Respondents - Pie Chart Funding - 11-16s only - Pie Chart

Playing Field

Respondents were asked if they felt the site at Station Road should be developed as a playing field. 71% of respondents (383 people) said "yes", 17% (94 people) said "no" and 12% have no opinion. The Chart below shows this support.

Chart to show Support for Playing Field Development

Playing Field Pie Chart Playing Field Graphic

Respondents were then asked if they thought Hemyock would benefit in incorporating plans for a sports hall and floodlit hard track onto the proposed playing field. 47% of respondents (248 people) said "yes", 38% (198 people) said "no" and 15% had no opinion.

Chart to show support for acquiring Additional Land for Recreational Use

Acquiring Additional Land Pie Chart

Table showing What Respondents Would Like to See in the Additional Area

No. Respondents

% Respondents

Riverside Park

237

82%

Wildlife Garden

149

51%

Under 5s Area

116

40%

Ornamental Village Garden

64

22%

Other

32

11%

459 respondents (83%) said they supported the plan to re-open as much of the Culm Valley Railway between Hemyock & Tiverton as possible for use for cycling, walking etc. 51 people (9%) were against this and 7% of respondents had no opinion. 172 people said they would be prepared to help with this proposal.

[Previous Page][Index][Next Page]


[DF&F Main Menu] [Community Profiles Menu] [Community Appraisals Menu] [Top of Page]
[Devon C.C. Homepage]
Page Created: January 2002
This Information was provided by Corporate Information Services
Send any comments, enquiries, etc. to DRIS@devon.gov.uk